I love my cousins! Three of them are brothers, PK’s (preacher’s kid), in seminary and/or youth pastors, and great men of God. I love being their friend on Facebook because they make me think. One posted today this question “Is tolerance love?” Now, he and I don’t exactly agree on the definition of tolerance, I think, but it was a great discussion and now I want to know what you think!
Here is my response:
If it’s in reference to sin. Nope. Love is patient, kind, etc. nowhere does it say tolerant. Dictionary.com says: to tolerate is to allow the existence, presence, practice, or act of without prohibition or hindrance; permit. It’s that "without prohibition or hindrance" part that does a disservice to others and ourselves.
And then later in response to a question about discipline and the assertion that God tolerates us:
Absolutely the level of "maturity" intellectually and spiritually has to be taken into account for discipline. I’m just picking on the word tolerate really. I despise the use of the word "tolerance" by the society in general – it isn’t used correctly in most cases. We all sin, and in Christ we must all strive to love the sinner and hate the sin in ourselves as well as others. The person and their behavior are not the same thing. To the original question of "is tolerance love," my answer is still no. Tolerance is permissiveness of behavior and love is acceptance of the person.
So in that vein I will quibble that God doesn’t tolerate us – He LOVES us. It is very much more and better than mere tolerance. He allows us free will and to make the choice to sin, but He will discipline us, therefore He is not "tolerating" us. I’ll stop arguing for the sake of argument now. (Can you tell I crave adult conversation!!!!!)![]()
I know, I’m really picky about precise use of language, but I feel very strongly about “tolerance.” I feel that tolerance (including within the church) has brought society to its current woeful condition. I read an article recently that very bluntly stated that Christian parents shouldn’t blame the fact that their children aren’t Christians on the word of God having failed, because in many, many cases the word of God was never taught. “Christian” churches around the world preach love but not discipline, the idea of Christ’s sacrifice, but not the truth of it. We tolerate little things because they are harmless and then as we become desensitized we tolerate more and more until we are surrounded by sin which we tolerate and hardly recognize as the sin it is. We don’t want to call behaviors what they are (sin!) because we might offend someone because of our lack of tolerance. We are called to correct one another in love, not tolerate! It applies to ourselves as well. Do we take a good look in the mirror? Do we excuse our own sinful behavior because “everyone else does it?” I sometimes imagine our heavenly Father rolling his eyes and sighing in exasperation as I sin repeatedly voicing feeble excuses as choose to behave in a way I know is wrong.
My cousin called the point to question though, should the same level of discipline apply to everyone regardless of their age or spiritual maturity? My answer to that is above – no. A person needs to know that something is wrong. That is why we cannot tolerate sin. We must tell them that it is sin. We must immerse ourselves in God’s word and develop friendships with like-minded believers in order to be constantly aware of our own sinful nature and behaviors. We need to recognize that God loves us, but it is against His nature to tolerate sin. We must share God’s love with others, and in order to do so I think we must share His intolerance of sin.
This might sound legalistic, but what I am trying to do is emphasize the fact that love is so great, huge, all-encompassing, it is strengthened by truth and the refusal to tolerate sin. Tolerating sin, to me, is not an act of love. Now, if we’re talking about tolerating socks on the floor, that is an entirely different story!
So what do you think?








